Answers
Straight answers to questions teams ask when documentation lives in GitHub and not everyone who needs to review it does.
How do I get someone to review docs without a GitHub account?
Three ways to let a PM, lawyer or client review documentation that lives in GitHub when they have no GitHub login: email sign-in, a shareable review link, or a doc review.
How do I review AI-generated documentation before it merges?
A practical way to put a person between an AI agent's documentation pull request and your main branch: a review queue, feedback the agent can act on, and a recorded sign-off.
How do I get legal or a client to sign off on docs that live in Git?
How to collect a named approval from legal, compliance or a client on documentation stored in a repository, without teaching them Git, and what a sign-off record does and does not prove.
How do I keep an audit record of human review for AI-written docs?
What a useful record of human review contains, how DraftView creates and seals it, and why a record supports oversight but does not make you compliant on its own.
Can reviewers suggest edits to Markdown, AsciiDoc or MDX files without knowing the syntax?
How a reviewer can edit a rendered page in a browser while your team still gets clean source changes and native GitHub Suggested Changes.
How can reviewers suggest edits to AsciiDoc files without learning AsciiDoc?
How a PM, lawyer or subject expert can review and edit AsciiDoc and Antora documentation on a rendered page, while your team gets clean AsciiDoc changes back in the pull request.